By Avery Dulles
An interdenominational
movement that originated in American Protestantism toward the end of the 19th century.
It was a reaction against the liberal and modernistic currents of theology that
infiltrated the seminaries and universities, especially in the Northern and Eastern
parts of the United States .
Drawing its strength principally from the rural areas and small towns of the "Bible
belt" (the South and Midwest ), old-fashioned
evangelical faith found expression in various gatherings, notably in annual Bible
conferences, at which the so-called "higher criticism" of the Bible was
deplored. The Niagara Bible Conference of 1878 drew up 14 "fundamentals of
the faith," which were later reduced to five: (1) the inspiration and inerrancy
of the Bible; (2) the virgin birth and full deity of Christ; (3) Christ's death
as a sacrifice to satisfy the divine justice; (4) Christ's bodily resurrection;
and (5) Christ's return in bodily form to preside at the Last Judgment. In some
lists the miracles of Christ in his public ministry took the place of his second
coming as the fifth fundamental.
Origin and Development
In Los Angeles , California ,
two brothers, Milton and Lyman Stewart, promoted the movement by founding in 1908
the Los Angeles Bible Institute and establishing the Stewart Evangelistic fund to
promote their conservative views. With their financial support a series of 12 small
volumes, titled The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth, were published
between 1910 and 1915. The Stewarts mailed some three million copies of these books
free of charge to pastors, missionaries, theology students, and church workers.
These booklets, containing 90 articles by scholars from Europe and North America,
defended the inspiration and total inerrancy of the Bible, opposed the "higher
criticism," and attacked evolutionism and the "social gospel." Contrary
to scientific biblical scholarship, they asserted that the Pentateuch (except Dt
34) was written by Moses himself.
The movement took another
step forward in 1919, with the founding of the World's Christian Fundamentals Association,
which published a quarterly review and conducted annual rallies in various North
American cities during the next decade. About 1920 the title "Fundamentalist"
first came into currency, signifying, as one newspaper expressed it, one who does
"battle royal for the Fundamentals." This title was accepted by the adherents
as a badge of honor. "Creation science," based on a strict interpretation
of GENESIS, was promoted as an alternative to Darwinism.
During the 1920s many
American Protestant churches, especially those with strong evangelical tendencies—
such as the Presbyterians, Methodists, Baptists, and Disciples of Christ—became
split into Fundamentalist and Modernist camps, with an amorphous group caught in
the middle. The Lutherans and Episcopalians felt the controversy (Page
28) less acutely, being more securely rooted in their confessional traditions.
Although Fundamentalism
was primarily the fruit of simplistic popular thinking, it acquired intellectual
respectability through the support of several distinguished theologians. Benjamin
B. Warfield of Princeton Theological Seminary, perhaps the most eminent of America 's
conservative Presbyterian scholars, contributed to the first volume of The Fundamentals.
John Gresham Machen, also of Princeton , while preferring
to call himself simply a Calvinist, likewise supported the Fundamentalist cause.
Decline
Largely through Fundamentalist
pressures, several state legislatures barred the teaching of evolution in public
schools. In 1925 John T. Scopes, a high school biology teacher in Dayton , Tenn. ,
was accused of teaching Darwinism in violation of the law. Behind the immediate
question of evolution loomed the larger question whether the Bible was totally free
of error in its obvious meaning, as understood by the ordinary reader. Although
Scopes was convicted and the constitutionality of the statute upheld, William Jennings
Bryan's feeble performance as a witness for the prosecution and the unfavorable
publicity given to the case in the secular press resulted in a major setback for
Fundamentalism.
In the mid-1920s the
Fundamentalist tide began to recede. In 1927 Princeton Seminary, the traditional
bastion of conservative orthodoxy, opened itself to other theological tendencies.
In 1929 Machen resigned his post to found a new conservative seminary in Philadelphia , and ultimately
(in 1936) his own Orthodox Presbyterian Church.
Although Fundamentalism
lost much of its influence, important Protestant groups, especially in the Netherlands and the U.S. , remain strongly committed to the
view that the Bible, understood in its obvious literal meaning, is totally inerrant.
The more sophisticated representatives of conservative Evangelicalism, such as Carl
F. H. Henry and Edward J. Carnell, sought to shed the Fundamentalist label and to
identify themselves with international conservative Protestant bodies, such as the
World Evangelical Fellowship. But the Fundamentalist mentality continues to manifest
itself in some parts of the United
States . In 1981, for example, the State of Arkansas adopted a law requiring
that "creation science" be taught alongside of evolutionary theory in
public schools. That law was later ruled unconstitutional.
Catholic Responses
Fundamentalism properly
so called can have no legitimate place in Catholic theology. Already in the 17th
century the Catholic bishop J. B. Bossuet controverted the view of the Calvinist
Pierre Jurieu that a few "fundamental articles" could be a sufficient
test of orthodoxy. In his encyclical Mortalium animos (1928) Pius XI rejected
the distinction between fundamental and nonfundamental articles. The "five
fundamentals," while true if rightly understood, do not mention all that Catholics
consider basic to their faith. The omission of the Trinity, the Church, and the
sacraments gives a markedly sectarian slant to the Fundamentalist platform.
Certain anti-Modernist
trends in Catholic theology ran parallel to Protestant Fundamentalism. Catholics
regarded by some as ultraconservative opposed the scientific study of the Scriptures
and sought to defend every sentence of the Bible in what they took to be its obvious
sense. They rejected the idea of human evolution as unbiblical and repudiated the
practice of distinguishing between different "literary forms" in books
deemed to be historical. Pius XII in his encyclical Divino afflante Spiritu
(1943), correcting these tendencies, endorsed scientific literary and historical
criticism and a prudent use of the method of form criticism. In 1993 the Pontifical
Biblical Commission issued a document on The Interpretation of the Bible in the
Church, which included a severe criticism of Fundamentalism for offering false
certitudes and for confusing the divine substance of the Bible with what are in
fact its human limitations. The United States Catholic Bishops' Conference in 1987
established an ad hoc committee on Biblical Fundamentalism that warned against the
deceptive attractions of Fundamentalism, calling attention to its tendency to neglect
the role of the Church in the transmission of Christian faith.
\
G. M. MARSDEN, Fundamentalism and American Culture (New York 1980); Understanding
Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism (Grand Rapids, Mich. 1991). T. M. O'MEARA, Fundamentalism: A Catholic Perspective (New York 1990). PONTIFICAL BIBLICAL COMMISSION, The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church
(Vatican City
1993). UNITED STATES BISHOPS' COMMITTEE, "Pastoral Statement for Catholics on Biblical
Fundamentalism," Origins 17 (Nov. 5, 1987) 376–77. H. A HARRIS, Fundamentalism and Evangelicals (Oxford 1998).
Source Citation: DULLES, A. "Fundamentalism." New
Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 6. 2nd ed. Detroit : Gale, 2003. 27-29.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.