Evangelical Theology
By I. S. Rennie
Contemporary
evangelical theology has long and deep roots. Some consider that it was
primarily formed by reaction to theological liberalism, and while it is no
doubt true that this conflict has frequently introduced a certain complexion to
evangelical theology, its basic substance is drawn from the heritage of
orthodox Christian theological formation. Evangelical theology in essence
stands in the great Christian theological tradition.
Evangelical theology
goes back to the creeds of the first centuries of the Christian era, in which
the early church sought to correlate the teaching of Scripture, penetrate its
meaning and defend it. In concert with the thought of this period, evangelical
theology affirms that: the Bible is the truthful revelation of God and through
it the life-giving voice of God speaks; God is the almighty creator and we are
his dependent creation; God has entered history redemptively in the incarnation
of Jesus Christ; God’s nature exists in Trinitarian expression; Jesus Christ is
fully divine and fully human; the power and judgment of sin is a reality for
all humanity; God graciously takes the initiative in coming to us savingly in
Jesus Christ and by the Holy Spirit; Jesus Christ is building his church; and
the consummation of history will be expressed in the second advent of Jesus
Christ, the general resurrection, the final judgment, heaven and hell.
Evangelical theology
also has strong links with the early medieval church. It draws heavily upon the
satisfaction view of the atonement enunciated by Anselm of Canterbury and
shares the concomitant stress upon the passion of Jesus Christ expressed by
no-one more fully than Bernard of Clairvaux.
Evangelical theology
has particular ties with the distinctives of the Protestant Reformation. It is
deeply committed to the centrality of the Bible, to its power by the Holy
Spirit with special reference to preaching, to its final authority in all
matters of doctrine and life, and to the necessity of interpreting it as naturally
as possible and disseminating it widely in the vernacular. It is equally
committed to justification by faith in which acceptance with God is received by
trusting his loving self-disclosure and not by any human accomplishment. It
also readily confesses that the church is composed of all believers who have
thus been incorporated by the Holy Spirit, and who have direct, personal and
constant access to their heavenly Father.
The Reformation
expressed itself in various institutional structures, frequently the result of
nationalistic impulse, and in these entities many of the diversities within
evangelical theology arose. There were differences in understanding the nature
of the sacraments, the place of the divine decrees in relation to personal
salvation, the time of the millennium, the form of church government, the
precise nature of biblical inspiration, the way to arrive at Christian
assurance and the relation of the church to culture and the state -- most of
which would be considered by evangelicals today as matters of somewhat
secondary importance.
Evangelical theology
is also deeply indebted to the series of evangelical awakenings which began
about the middle of the 18th century. Here the tendency was to reaffirm the
theology of the great and received tradition, and to lay special emphasis on
the theology of the Christian life. The nature of saving faith, or conversion,
was continually to the fore, as was the consciousness of the love of God in
Christ and the change of disposition which accompanied it, although there might
be differences about the instantaneousness of conversion. The means and
possibilities of sanctification were also emphasized, while once again there
could be some disagreement over timing and possible achievement. The theology
of corporate spiritual life was also stressed, assigning special consideration
to the renewing of the church, the evangelizing of the world and the improving
of society.
By the third decade
of the 19th century there is evidence that evangelical theology was about to
break out of its preoccupation with the theology of the Christian life, and
through serious exegetical work and reflective thought once again make the
orthodox theological heritage a vibrant option as had been done in the early
Middle Ages and at the Reformation. Unfortunately for evangelical theology it
was hit just at this time with the full force of theological liberalism, which
combined the older Enlightenment rationalism with the post-Kantian stress on
the human consciousness as the bridge to the knowledge of God -- which was
singularly appealing to a Romantic age. Amid such a scene, evangelical theology
tended to move either into enervating accommodation with the new views or
retreat into a ghetto, defending the received deposit and shooting at almost
anything that moved. While such ‘confessionalists’ did yeoman service in
upholding the essentials of orthodox theology, they frequently did so in a way
that dismissed much of their contemporary world of thought out of hand, played
down the distinctive evangelical emphases on the theology of the Christian
life, and gave the impression that the final formulation of all theology was
imbedded in the confessions of the Reformation period.
One glimmer of what
evangelical theology might have been was the Dutch school that emerged later in
the century around Abraham Kuyper. Their genius was able to affirm the orthodox
tradition, have a profound sense of the importance of a theology of the
Christian life in all its ramifications, and at the same time be sensitive to
many of the issues and approaches being raised by the world in which they
lived.
In the late 19th
century, as the pressure of theological liberalism continued to intensify and
evangelicalism weakened, an even more defensive evangelical theology arose in
the form of fundamentalism. Its key bulwark was an extreme millenarianism which
affirmed that the church and society were hurtling into irremediable ruin.
Christianity had nothing to say to the issues of the ‘now’; it was all in the
‘not yet’.
From the middle of
the 20th century, a revitalization has been taking place within evangelical
theology. British scholars have contributed a serious and scholarly exegetical
approach; Americans have been hard at work in areas of systematic theology and
its adjunct disciplines such as apologetics and ethics; the Dutch and the
Mennonites have been developing theologies of social action from significantly
diverse starting-points, and the Pentecostal/charismatic movement has been
enunciating a theology of the Holy Spirit which insists that God is powerfully
and miraculously present through the church to minister to the needs of
mankind.
Finally, it should
be emphasized that evangelical theology is what might be termed a spiritual
theology. It has a way of doing theology which is again part of the great
theological tradition. It is ‘live’ orthodoxy. The Bible is not only central
to the theological enterprise, but it is meditated upon and prayed over as well
as studied. The goal of theological work is not so much to know theology as to
know God; the temptations of academic pride must be mortified, theology must be
done within a community of love and out of love for others, and in the
awareness that the return of Jesus Christ and the day of accounting is near.
Thus the whole of the evangelical theological enterprise is for the glory of
God.
Bibliography
D. G. Bloesch, The
Evangelical Renaissance (Grand Rapids, MI, 1973); idem, the
Future of Evangelical Christianity: A Call for Unity Amid Diversity (New
York, 1983); G. W. Bromiley, Historical Theology: An Introduction (Grand
Rapids, MI, 1978); E. J. Carnell, The Case for Biblical Christianity
(Grand Rapids, MI, 1968); C. F. H. Henry (ed.), Christian Faith and Modern
Theology (New York, 1964); E. Jay, The Religion of the Heart: Anglican
Evangelicalism and the Nineteenth-Century Novel (Oxford, 1979); G. M.
Marsden, Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth
Century Evangelicalism 1870–1925 (New York, 1980); Mark A. Noll, Between
Faith and Criticism: Evangelicals, Scholarship, and the Bible in America
(San Francisco, CA, 1987); B. L. Ramm, The Evangelical Heritage (Waco,
TX, 1973); idem, After Fundamentalism: The Future of Evangelical
Theology (San Francisco, CA, 1985); E. R. Sandeen, The Roots of
Fundamentalism: British and American Millenarianism 1800–1930 (Chicago,
1970); J. D. Woodbridge et al., The Gospel in America: Themes in
the Story of America’s Evangelicals (Grand Rapids, MI, 1979).
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.