GRACE MINISTRY MYANMAR

John 13:34 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another."

Monday, September 25, 2017

6 Reasons Why Churches Aren’t Transforming Minds (and What to Do About It!)

6 Reasons Why Churches Aren’t Transforming Minds (and What to Do About It!)
Written by David Seemuth

After 33 years as an Associate Pastor at one church, I found myself unemployed. So, I went to see what was out there. I toured different churches of many brands and styles.
I visited one church where a Pastor directed the staff to take a picture ten minutes into each of the four Weekend services. On Mondays, a staff member would count the weekend attendees. Their reason was “theologically based” in Acts 2:41, “…and about three thousand were added to their number that day.”
Counting is clearly pragmatic, but numbers alone seemed like thin ice to stand on theologically.
At another Church, I encountered a woman grieving the tragic death of her son. One person said to her, “Aren’t you glad you have your other children?”
What was this person thinking? As followers of Jesus, shouldn’t we respond to grief with thoughtful responses—not unthinking, empty words?
The “thinking” I saw during my tour of churches left me discouraged. There were a lot of good things going on in the churches I visited, but where was the “transformation of the mind?”
Transformation of the Mind
What does it mean to know God and grow in our discipleship? For Paul, “transformation of the mind” was key.
“Have the same way of thinking as Jesus the King had.” (Philippians 2:5)
Later in the letter, Paul describes what a person with such thinking would focus on:
Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things. (Philippians 4:8)
The life of the follower of Jesus is perhaps most clearly summarized in Paul’s words in Romans 12:
“Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.”
So, why are Churches struggling to renew minds? And what can we do about it?
1. We confuse being accessible with being simplistic.
Congregations have a range of educational backgrounds. Speaking to everyone is tough. Of course, no one wants to hear a teacher or preacher intentionally use words that are totally out of reach of a congregation. Moreover, it’s true that what people seem to want are “simple thoughts” and “simple truths. The problem is that life is not simple; it is complex.
Rather than “dumbing it down” to cater to a desire for a simplicity that can never lead to mature faith, every church leader, teacher, or preacher must be willing to do the hard work of making the complex accessible. Renewal of the mind comes when we urge thoughtful discussion, even in the midst of complexities.
Renewal of the mind comes when we urge thoughtful discussion in the midst of complexities. 
2. We create a false dichotomy between experience and intellect. 
Brain imaging science has shown us how important experience is. Right brain activity, usually associated with experience and emotion, is not separate from the intellect—it is a part of thinking! Sadly churches often pit intellect and emotion against each other;
Consider the example of the Eucharist. The Eucharist is first experienced: we taste, smell, and share the meal. The Eucharist is not primarily explainable, though theologians have certainly tried to do that. That experience, among so many experiences in worship, is part of the renewal of the mind.
The renewal of the mind occurs through both experience and intellect. Churches need to facilitate experiences of the Holy Spirit and then be ready to help people process the thoughts.
3. We get stuck in the how rather than the why of being the church.
Being practical is important. We must get things done. But, let’s get the right things done. As followers of Jesus (and not business people), our being practical needs must be rooted in theological reflection and conversation over what we do and how we do it.
For instance, each interaction between members of the church, whether in weekend services or occasional greetings, have the potential for bringing renewal by the Spirit. This is what Paul is aiming for when he gives instructions for worship gatherings in 1 Corinthians 14. Interactions should bring “encouragement, comfort, and edification” (1 Corinthians 14:3). The end result is that the Corinthians would “stop thinking like children,” a true renewal of the mind! (1 Corinthians 14:20).
We create opportunities for the renewal of the mind when we stop focusing on the “how” of ministry and reflect on why.
We create opportunities for the renewal of the mind when we shift from how’s? to why ?'s
4. We settle for fill in the blank study over theological understanding. 
We have a plethora of study guides that rely on “fill-in-the-blank” answers. The assumption is that this method is enough to help people move from filling in the answer to understanding the thought behind the question and the answer.
Now, I’m guilty of this. I have written and published several fill-in-the-blank study guides. However, as I’ve trained leaders, I found a hunger for rich discussion about the theology behind the questions and answers. We need to help people move from “fill-in-the-blank” to “explain-the-thought.”
Renewal of the mind will come as we teach for understanding, not just correct answers.
5. We strive for efficiency in leadership training rather than proficiency. 
We all know leaders are busy. They want wise, effective use of their time. Thus, they want meetings to be on point and on time.
When you give those same leaders the opportunity to go deeper on a subject, they can get excited, and don’t care as much about the time. We shouldn’t assume leaders are too busy for learning. For 30 years as a pastor and professor I saw ministry leaders spend as much as 45 hours a week for a semester of theological training. They would even pay for it, and even if they weren’t going to receive college credit! Many said they simply wanted to be more prepared for ministry.
Renewal of the mind means training leaders until they are proficient, not limiting them to training that is time efficient.
6. We assume limited understanding rather than boundless resources. 
According to the New Yorker magazine, on May 31, 2016, Stephen Hawking, world-renowned physicist, spoke to a television interviewer in London and called presidential nominee Donald Trump “a demagogue who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator.” Moments later, Google reported a sharp increase in searches for the terms “demagogue,” “denominator,” and “Stephen Hawking.”
Regardless of your political affiliations, this demonstrates the ubiquity of resources at our fingertips. We needn’t dumb down language or assume limited understanding. We can push congregations to explore ideas through the vast resources at their fingertips.
To renew minds, we encourage the women and men of our churches to take advantage of their resources and learn on their own.
To renew minds, we must not dumb down language or assume limited understanding!
Share:

Friday, September 8, 2017

The Gospel According to Acts


The Gospel According to Acts
NT Wright

The Acts of the Apostles is one of the longest books in the New Testament, but it's also something of a page turner! Luke was a skilled narrator; if you sit down and read the book straight through, you'll find there really isn't a dull page in the whole thing.
It covers quite a long time, telling the story from Jesus's resurrection right through to when Paul arrives in Rome, which is probably A.D. 60: a 30-year span compressed into one book.
I suspect that the reason for the book’s length is that in the first century that's more or less what you can get on a scroll.
What Luke Doesn’t Tell Us
There are many things, of course, that Luke doesn't tell us because this isn't actually ‘Early Church History’. There are lots of other things we'd love to know. For instance:
Where did Peter go after he disappeared in Chapter 12? What was James doing all that time when he was the ‘big man’ in Jerusalem? What about all the expansion of the church to the south and to the east?
Instead, Luke concentrates on Paul, and as we go along, we will see there is good reason for that.
A Sequel for Theophilus
Luke begins Acts just as he began his Gospel because this book is the sequel. Both are addressed to someone called ‘Theophilus’.
‘Dear Theophilus’, he says. ‘The previous book I wrote had to do with everything Jesus began to do and teach’.
We don't actually know who Theophilus was. It may be that, actually, it is a made up name meaning one who is a ‘lover of God’. That would mean Luke is writing for anyone who loves God and wants to know what God has done in Jesus and what God is continuing to do in Jesus—and that's what the next line says.
‘I wrote’, he says ‘in the Gospel about everything Jesus began to do and teach’. The implication being: Jesus hasn't stopped doing and teaching. Rather through his Holy Spirit, Jesus is still active and going on doing what he came to do.
The Kingdom of God
It's pretty clear that what Luke is talking about throughout this book, and what he was talking about for much of the Gospel of Luke, is the kingdom of God. What does the kingdom of God look like? What does it mean for God to become king? What does it mean for God to take charge?
Today people often say 'Well, if God really was in charge, if God really did do something dramatic in and through Jesus, then surely God wouldn't have just allowed the world to go to rack and ruin the way it seems to still be doing all the time!’.
But Jesus said again and again, in the Sermon on the Mount and in his parables, ‘This is what the kingdom of God is like. It's quite different from what you've imagined'.
Likewise, Luke intends to say, ‘Actually, this is what it looks like when God takes charge. Jesus gives instructions to his chosen apostles. He equips them by his Spirit. This is what it looks like when Jesus himself is now the Lord of the world’.
It's very surprising. Sometimes it's actually shocking. Because things don't work out as they want it to. Things don't work out the way that we might want them to. But, by the end of the book, the full sweep from Acts Chapter 1 to Acts Chapter 28, we find that Paul is in Rome announcing the kingdom of God and the lordship of Jesus.
A Strange New Phenomenon
Everybody in Luke's day knew Rome was the center of the great imperial power. Paul was announcing that God is God, God is King, Jesus is Lord, right under the very nose of Caesar himself.
Something has happened in A.D. 30 or 33 when Paul is converted. Nobody outside of a small geographical area had heard of Jesus of Nazareth. By the time Paul is in Rome people across the then-known world know who Jesus is. At least they've heard what people are saying about him. Within another couple of generations or so the Roman emperors had to do business with the leaders of this movement of people called ‘Christians’.
What is this strange new phenomenon that has been unleashed upon our unsuspecting world? Our unsuspecting empire?
Luke begins by introducing us once more to the risen Jesus. The beginning of The Acts of the Apostles hooks onto the end of Luke's gospel. ‘Jesus’, he says, ‘showed himself to the disciples alive, after suffering, by many proofs. He was seen by them for 40 days during which he spoke about God's kingdom’.
It's pretty clear that what Luke is talking about throughout this book, and what he was talking about for much of the Gospel of Luke, is the kingdom of God. What does the kingdom of God look like? What does it mean for God to become king? What does it mean for God to take charge?
That sense of this being all about a fresh understanding of the Kingdom is important throughout the book.
As they were having a meal together, he began telling them what the kingdom would look like. He said 'I want you to stay here in Jerusalem to wait for the Father's promise’. He says they should remember how it was when John baptized with water. But in a few days from now, you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit. 
Just as at the end of Luke, just as at the end of John, there's a sense that if the disciples are now to be for the world what Jesus had been for Israel, they are going to need to be equipped with his Holy Spirit.
It isn't the case that Jesus is just going away and leaving them to figure it all out themselves. They'll have a lot of figuring out to do. But they will have God's own Spirit. This mysterious personal power. This new breath. This new energy which they called the Spirit or the Holy Spirit is what will guide them and direct them. 
What Do Jesus’s Resurrection and Ascension Mean?
What we see then in this first paragraph or so of Acts is the whole question about Jesus being risen and the risen Christ being ascended. What, then, does it mean that Jesus is Israel's messiah?
If we go back to the Old Testament we see in passages like Isaiah 9, Isaiah 11, Isaiah 42, that the messiah, when he comes, will be the Lord of the whole world.
Luke will later draw upon Psalm 2. In Psalm 72, when we see this picture of Israel's true king, the ultimate seed of David, who is going to be the Lord of the whole world, such that from sea to sea, from north to south, all over, people are going to pay him homage.
Throughout the Old Testament period, though, that remained a grandiose and seemingly impossible dream.
It happened briefly under Solomon, David's heir and successor. It was Solomon who built the temple which is significant for the story we are going to be telling. But it's never subsequently been realized. The Davidic kings had died out at the time of the exile and different people in Jesus's day and centuries before had wondered if and when God would ever fulfill these promises to send a king, to send a messiah, to send somebody who would actually be the Lord of the world in the way that He'd always promised.
There must have been many times where that promise seemed to be in the balance, when they must have said maybe there's not ever going to be a king. Maybe it's just a nice idea. A general metaphorical way of talking about how God is going to put the whole world right. But, nevertheless, there were many who clung onto their original hope. 
Jesus says, ‘How foolish you are! How slow of heart to believe all of the prophets had said. Was it not necessary that the messiah would suffer these things and enter his glory?’. What we see in Acts is Jesus entering into his glory. Because his glory, as in Psalm 8, is his rule as the messiah, as the truly human one, as God incarnate over the whole world.
Again, it doesn't look like what we or they might have suspected but this is the story that Luke is telling. So, Jesus goes on and responds to the disciples question. They think, ‘Well, Jesus has been crucified; that was not our game plan. He's now been raised from the dead’. That was a complete surprise as well.
They are still trying to get their heads around what it all means. In verse 6 they say 'Master, is this the time you are going to restore the kingdom to Israel?' You see what they're thinking. They are imagining on the basis of the Psalms and the prophets.
'Okay. We're tracking with what the scriptures had said: that if a messiah comes and does the extraordinary things Jesus did, it seems he should have had to do this also’.
Presumably that means that Israel is going to be, as Deuteronomy had said, the top nation is the head and not the tail. The world leader. The one through whom now God is going to bring his New World to birth. To bring justice and peace to bear on the rest of creation. That's their dream and they will be part of it. They are the 12 representing Israel.
But Jesus doesn't just come out and answer their questions. There's a question about when these things will happen, he says. There's a question about what exactly will happen.
People debate and argue as to whether in verses 7 and 8 Jesus is saying ‘no’ or ‘yes’. I have a good friend who would say that Jesus’ answer is actually, ‘No this is not the time; God is not restoring the kingdom. You have a job in the meantime. Then God will restore the kingdom’. That is an option that some people take. 
The Agenda
But I think it's quite clear that actually in Verses 7 and 8, Jesus is saying ‘We're not talking about times; we haven't got a chronology mapped out. That's something that God the Father has got all on His own authority. But what will happen is that you will receive power when the Spirit comes upon you and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, in Judea, in Samaria and to the ends of the earth’.
That's the agenda. That is the agenda that we see then lived out through Acts. In Judea, because in the early chapters of Acts are all focused on Jerusalem itself and little province of Judea. But then in Acts 8, Philip goes off to Samaria and the Samaritans who were so distrusted and sometimes actually hated by the Jewish people, they hear the word of God and respond to it! 
Another King
Then, of course, through the mission of Paul particularly, but actually starting with Peter, in Acts 10 and 11, the gospel goes out to the gentile world as well.
So by the end it has, in principle, reached to the ends of the earth. Because, just as all roads led to Rome in the ancient world, so all roads led from Rome. Once you had planted the gospel in one of those great cities, and ultimately in Rome itself, the word was going to get out into the rest of the world.
So I think what Luke is saying is that Jesus is saying, ‘Yes but maybe not in the way you’d expect’. It doesn't look like a naturalist or military takeover. Rather it looks like the church bearing witness like ambassadors going out to foreign countries to say, ‘Not only do we have a new king, but actually he's your king as well’. That's how it works, again and again, in Acts, announcing Jesus as the world's true lord.
This is why, for instance, in Acts 17, when Paul and Silas are in Thessalonica, the crowds hear what they're saying: there's another king, namely, Jesus. That is the message of Acts. That there is another king and that it is Jesus. And this opening chapter of Acts is all about how his rule is being launched on earth as in heaven. That's what it's all about.
When we look at the Book of Acts, it comes basically in two halves. It divides at the end of Chapter 12. Up to the end of Chapter 12, we are basically still in the Middle East in the world of the Jews and their immediate neighbors, including the Samaritans, including some of the other territories that bump up against them. Yes, there is a hint, when Peter goes to Cornelius in Acts 10 and 11, that this is a sign that the gospel is going out to the Gentiles. And at the end of Chapter 11 there's a sign that now in Syria, in the great city of Antioch, that there's now a community that goes by the name Christianoi, ‘Christians’ for the first time.
Basically, Acts 1-12 is the proclamation of Jesus as the king of the Jews under the nose of the present Jewish authorities, particularly of the Herods, just as in the gospels. There always seems to be a Herod in the background looking over the shoulder and saying ‘What's going on here? I'm the king of the Jews thank you very much’. But at the end of Acts 12, the Herod at the time, Herod Antipas I, comes to a bad end.
So then we move to the second half of the book in Chapters 13-28, it is all about the gospel going out to the gentile world, into Caesar's world, into the world with a very different lord. Lord is kyrios in Greek, so this is the land of Kyrios Kyser, Lord Caesar. The gospel goes out there, though it has a hard time getting to Rome. Paul finally gets there because he is imprisoned, and appeals to Caesar to hear his case.
When he gets there, Luke says he is able then, even though he is under house arrest, to announce God as king and Jesus as Lord openly and without interference, with nobody stopping him and telling him, ‘No you can't say that here’. That, for Luke, is the climax of the book. That he is announcing these things with all boldness. That's one of thekey terms in Acts. The boldness which enables people to talk about Jesus in the face (sometimes literally) of rulers   and authorities or whoever they may be. They're not shy; they're not afraid, because they believe that Jesus is the world's true Lord. So Luke says they do this and Paul does it with all boldness and with no one stopping him.
You might have thought well there would be plenty of people in Rome who want to say, ‘For goodness sake, shut up that person because he is a nuisance’, but they don't. As far as Luke is concerned, it's been a huge journey to get there but the gospel has gotten to the end of the earth. So we see then in this first short section of Acts 1:1-8, that this is how the kingdom is launched. Not just in Jesus himself but, granted his death on the cross, his resurrection. This is now the commissioning of the disciples to take the news of this kingdom to the ends of the earth.
Spaceman Jesus?
We now come to verses 9-11 of Acts Chapter 1, one of the most difficult passages for the average modern reader, which is the ascension of Jesus.
So often we have looked at that biblical text and have been puzzled. Just what are we supposed to think? Did Jesus really do a vertical take-off like a spaceman? I know churches where there is a great east window with a picture of the ascension of Jesus going up and all you can see is a cloud with two feet sticking down and the disciples staring up as though to say, ‘What on earth is going on’ (of course, it isn't on earth by then, but still)?
People have really gotten hung up on that. They thought, are we supposed to believe that heaven, from their point of view, is a place within our solar system a few miles up above our present earth and what would that say about, for instance, people in other parts of the world?
Naiveté? Or Something Else?
But actually, first century Jews weren't nearly as naive as we've often imagined. They didn't think of heaven as a location within our space, time, matter, or universe. They thought of it as a different dimension (to use a more modern metaphor), or like a different mode of being, which intersects with our mode of being. Again, this is another way of putting a label on something that we don't have good language for.
But they were quite happy talking about up and down without meaning that God lived a long way upstairs and that we lived downstairs and maybe there would be other creatures down below as well. They used that language just like they use the language the prophets do of the sun and the moon being darkened and the stars falling from heaven when what they are talking about is a major socio-political catastrophe like the fall of Babylon in Isaiah 13.
Several other biblical passages work in that way. So, we have to be careful in imagining that oh, they seemed to think that this was a vertical takeoff, but of course, we can't really believe that. I think the answer to that supposition is ‘no’. This is standard first century language for heaven and earth, that Jesus goes from them into the heavenly dimension. 
Behind the Curtain
It's very interesting that throughout the New Testament, when the different writers talk about Jesus coming back again, sometimes they talk about His return but sometimes they talk about His appearing. First in Colossians 3 and then in 1 John 3 we are told that when He appears, it's not then that He's gone a long way away—it's that He's in a different dimension. It's as though He's behind an invisible curtain and one day the curtain will be removed and we will discover that He'd been there all along.
This language of heaven and earth, though it's confusing, is very important for us to get our heads around. Particularly because what's going on in the story of the Ascension is, of course, that the human Jesus with His risen physical body, physical and, perhaps, even more than physical because it now can't be hurt, it can't get sick, it can't die again; it's a more robust thing, not less. This body is now in God's space, God's dimension, God's heavenly presence. But for us, with centuries of philosophical wandering all over the map, this is very difficult to get our heads around.
Blame Platonism
I was once debating with my old friend, the late Marcus Borg, who said the whole point of the letter to the Hebrews and the Book of Acts is that Jesus, who is crucified and raised from the dead, is now in heaven. Marcus would say to me 'Tom, I just can't imagine that.' I used to say, ‘Marc, you need to work on your imagination, because the problem is that our imagination has been infected by Platonism particularly’.  
Around Paul's day and a little bit later, there were one or two philosophers in the world that we loosely call Middle Platonism, to distinguish from Plato himself, a few hundred years earlier and the Neoplatonists from a few hundred years later. It's a loose label but it means great philosophers like Philo and Plutarch, one a Jew then and the other a Gentile, in the first century.
For them, the worlds that we have and all that there is, was at least two-fold. There was a heavenly world and there was an earthly world. But for them, heaven and earth were not compatible. The problem was that we were marooned on earth like voyagers stuck on a desert island and we longed to get back to our real home, which was in heaven. Of course, that's what a lot of Christians think the New Testament is about. But it isn't. That's the view of Plutarch, one of those Middle Platonists. That we are on earth at the moment but we want to leave earth and go to heaven instead and instead of having a body we just want to have a soul because that's what heaven needs.
We are on earth at the moment but we want to leave earth and go to heaven instead and instead of having a body we just want to have a soul because that's what heaven needs. 
One Single Creation
As far as the Jewish world is concerned, God made one single creation: Heaven and Earth. A single, bifurcated reality with heaven and earth as the twin halves of God's good creation. It isn't that earth is the shabby bit and heaven is the nice bit. Heaven and earth are both good. God saw all that he had made and it was very good. We can get rid of the idea that Jesus wouldn't have wanted his body in that heavenly dimension because now heaven and earth are joined together in a new way in and through Jesus himself.
The Jews have various ways of conceiving this, and indeed, in the centuries before the times of Jesus, there was an entire literary genre which we may suppose goes with an entire set of spiritual possibilities or practices which were to do with finding a way of glimpsing or even having a revelation of things that were real in heaven and that we wanted to become real on earth.
We loosely call this literary genre apocalyptic because that word means revelation. An ‘Apocalyptic event’ happens when something is a present secret in the heavenly dimension is unveiled to the surprised and, perhaps, alarmed watchers still within the earthly dimension. I think that was often a literary genre that was used because people were aware in the long years of extended exile to the time in Babylon, though they have rebuilt the temple, and the temple, as we'll see later on, was the place where heaven and earth were supposed to come together.
Like a Son of Man
Though they've rebuilt the the temple, there was a sense that the job hadn't been finished. That the living glorious divine presence hadn't actually come back in power and glory as had been promised by Isaiah and Ezekiel in other places, which we'll look at later. So various seers and prophets and devout persons in their praying and their studying of scripture were hoping that maybe they would have some kind of revelation of heaven and earth coming together at last.
One of the most famous books in that genre is the book of Daniel in the Old Testament. We're not sure when Daniel was finally edited, probably in the first half of the second century B.C., though many of the stories undoubtedly go back a long way behind that. But it was written at that time of great crisis and turmoil for the people of God, with political disasters happening and then God doing surprising rescue operations.
In Daniel Chapter 7 there is this extraordinary vision of one like a son of man, a human figure, who seems to be oppressed and being attacked. But then, after the monsters have come up out of the sea and done their worst, (that's a symbol for the Pagan nations all around the people of God), after that, there's one like the son of man coming on the clouds and is presented before the Ancient of Days, before God the creator himself, and is actually seated on a throne right beside God himself. This is a scary thought. Are there now two Gods? No, unfailingly not.
This is written by Jewish monotheists who, within their monotheism, see that actually from the beginning, from the heaven and earth chapter, the Genesis Chapter 1, there is a role as humans, which as Psalm 8 puts it, is to be crowned with glory and honor and to have all things put into subjection under their feet. Somehow that line from Genesis 1 and the role of humans as being in God's image, God’s reflectors if you like, that coming through Psalm 8 what is man that you're mindful of him, the son of man that you take thought for him, you've made him a little lower than the angels to crown him with glory and honor, putting all things under his feet'.
This then comes through Daniel 7 and now to our surprise, and perhaps alarm, it turns out to be real. Jesus himself is the one like the son of a man who, having suffered at the hands of the beast, and particularly the last great beast, Rome itself, Jesus is now exalted. Jesus is now on the throne. This means of course that this really is the coming of the kingdom of God. Jesus is going to be enthroned and that from now on all the forces of darkness, all the monsters that have come up out of the sea, are going to eventually be put in their place.
Within this whole apocalyptic tradition, we look back and see that Luke is here tracking with what he and others had said in the gospel narratives. Because when Jesus is on trial before the high priest the day before he is finally crucified in Luke 22:66, the high priest asks him if he is indeed God's messiah. Jesus says, ‘Yes, and from now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of power’. Matthew 26:64 says the same thing. From now on this is how it's going to be. Some people have misread that passage and you can misread Mark 14 in that way as well. But I think the right way to read it is not ‘one day you'll look out the window and see the Son of man coming down to earth’. Rather, ‘from now on, you are going to see what it means’.
The son of man has come on the clouds and has been seated at the right hand of God himself. Everything is going to be different as a result of this. The beasts are going to be overthrown and the kingdom of God is being launched.
You can tell that this is what's in the author's mind because of the use of Psalm 110, as well as those passages in the Gospels and, from time to time, throughout Acts and elsewhere in the New Testament, notably in the Letter to the Hebrews, which reference ‘The Lord said to my Lord, sit at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool’.
This explanation of this 'one like the son of man' is the fulfillment of that great Psalm prophecy: one of the most quoted verses from the Old Testament in the whole of the New Testament. It's a statement that now already something has happened, as a result of which the world is a different place.
The Throne and the Cross
Jesus is now enthroned. How has that happened? Something to do with what he did on the cross. In the early chapters of Acts we'll see the little hints on how they're trying to navigate what it meant that Jesus died on the cross.
How does that mean that the kingdom of God can now be launched in a new way?
It seems to have something to do regarding Daniel 7, to do with the fact that through his death the powers have been put in their place. They have been held to account. They have been, in principle, condemned, even though they will still rage and make a lot of noise and actually make life, as we'll see, very difficult for Jesus's followers. There's another strand as well, which I think any first century reader of Acts would actually pick up reading Acts 1:9-11. Because many, many people, right across the Roman Empire, knew what happened when a Roman Emperor died. Actually, when Julius Caesar died, he wasn't even emperor at that stage, but he was trying to become some kind of supreme leader.
In 44 B.C. when he was assassinated, at his funeral, some clever person released an eagle so that as when Caesar was being burned on his funeral pyre, an eagle flew up into the sky and people said, ‘There it is; there's his soul being taken up to heaven’. So, who knows who organized and orchestrated that. But from then on, the senate voted that Julius Caesar was now divine. He had gone up to heaven. He was now a god and therefore conveniently his adopted son Augustus as he later became known, Octavian as he then was, could be styled 'Son of God' or 'Son of the deified one’. It's a very convenient thing if you're an emperor ruling a mighty empire. Actions become divine ones. Have your name on the coins and inscribe ‘Son of God’. Because that means everyone is going to want to obey you. Otherwise bad things may happen to them right there.
Acts happens under the shadow of imperial ideology which was actually the fastest growing religion in Paul's world. An ideology which said Caesar is Lord. He is the son of the deified one. So the Roman Empire now has the status of divinity to back it. 
Acts is saying, ‘No, Jesus is Lord’. Here's the difference: With Caesar, supposedly his soul has gone to heaven, so he's now joined the pantheon; he's joined Jupiter and all the rest, whatever that meant to people on the street, it certainly meant you better do what you're told and pay your taxes or it will be worse for you, etc., but Caesar was not coming back. Oh, I know that later there was a rumor of Nero coming back again, but that was just something that was rumbling along in the 70’s after Nero's death as a way of saying maybe the old emperor will come back one day. But nobody actually thought that somebody like Augustus or any emperor was going to come back in the same way that they had seen him go. 
Citizens of Heaven
But what we have here is, as Jesus is lifted out of sight, two men appear dressed in white. ‘Why are you standing here staring into heaven? This Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way that you saw him go’. So, whatever it was that they saw, there will be a fresh appearing. Here again people make a classic mistake. They think well, Jesus will come back and snatch us away so that we can go back to heaven with him. That's not what it means at all.
At the end of Philippians Chapter 3, Paul says very clearly, ‘We are citizens of heaven’. Yes, but from there we are waiting for the King, the Lord Jesus, the messiah, who will change our mortal bodies to be like his glorious body by the power which enables him to subject all things to himself. In other words, he is going to come back in order to sort out this world once and for all. We are not, in other words, looking to escape this world and go to heaven; we are part of the new project in which heaven and earth have been brought together in and through the person of Jesus himself, looking for the time when Jesus will return to make heaven and earth one at last. That has been the purpose, it seems, from the beginning. It is for that purpose that Jesus then commissions his disciples to go out as heralds of the king, to be witnesses to this new heaven and earth reality which has come to birth as we'll see in the second chapter. 
This is going to happen in quite almost literally a breathtaking way when the spirit comes upon them. But already what we see in Acts Chapter 1 is heaven and earth joined together in Jesus. If we know our business, we should be saying this is because, in this human being who is somehow the living embodiment of Israel's God, the promise of Genesis 1 has already been fulfilled. There is New Creation. He is the beginning of it and we are invited to join in.

From/: Prof. N.T. Wright, Lectures presented 22 May 2017, St. Andrews, Scotland
Share:

'Mercy' Is Our Battle Cry!

'Mercy' Is Our Battle Cry!

History is behind us and the future is before us! We stand at this moment in time as we have many times before in history, crying out "Mercy! Lord, have mercy on us and on our nation!"

This past November, for the first time since the early beginnings of our nation, record numbers of God-fearing men and women registered and exercised their right to vote, ushering in the election of our 45th president of the United States, Donald J. Trump. It was an ugly, bitter and unprecedented campaign causing many restless, sleepless nights and hours in prayer. There was urgency in the hearts of many people as we were witnessing a takeover of our nation, with the intent of globalizing and undermining the freedoms that have been fought and died for. The American church, long called "the sleeping giant," was awakening to the realization that our courts were being liberalized, our Constitution was being redefined and ignored before our very eyes, and there seemed nothing we could do to stop it.

A sense of desperation permeated the land. Some threw themselves into politics, others stockpiled ammunition and food, many more expressed themselves on social media, and tens of thousands voted, but in the flurry of desperate action and determination one thing became common—prayer. Much was at stake, but millions went to their knees across the nation and around the world, praying for a miracle and asking for God's help.  Churches were praying, righteous voices throughout the land were calling for awakening and revival, other nations fasted and prayed for us, and there was a remnant that began to cry out for mercy.
The cry began feebly, but it began to gain momentum as God released dreams, visions and prophetic revelation confirming His desire: He wanted to give America mercy!  His Word once again reassured us, "He delights in showing mercy." People dreamed about mercy, others encountered angels declaring mercy, and everywhere burdened hearts asked for mercy. Shortly before the election, God gave a vision that became the fuel for the prayer surge leading up to Election Day. It was a vision of coins raining down from heaven and across each one was the word "Mercy." However, the vision concluded with these words: "Mercy is our new currency." Out of the turmoil and chaos building in our nation, God saw fit to release the understanding that we were to begin operating under a different economy and a different way of thinking. The old currency was giving way to a new medium of exchange, Old Glory was being traded for New Glory, and mercy would triumph over judgment! As millions lifted their voices asking for mercy, God responded and gave us, and our nation, a window of mercy.

Several thousand Christian leaders gathered at the Christian Inaugural Gala in January to "Celebrate God's Mercy," artwork was created to picture the mercy that we received, and now a coin has been minted to commemorate what God is extending to us all.  The Mercy Coin is a prophetic decree that God's mercy triumphs over judgment and He is calling this great nation out of darkness and into His marvelous light.  The Mercy Coin is a battle cry, as daily we cry out for mercy—for our president, for our leaders, over our citizens, and over the United States of America. Join us today, lift your voice and declare a continued outpouring of God's mercy as we each purchase a remembrance piece, a tangible reminder and a powerful focal point that commemorates what God has done and will continue to do for our nation as mercy continues to be our battle cry!
Share:

COPE LANGH KHAN KAM

Featured Post

URBAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP

By: Cope Langh Khan Kam Youth Urban Leadership One of the possible issues that cause Youth Leadership Instability in the Church m...

Wikipedia

Search results

´